At The Kids Research Institute Australia, our vision is simple – happy, healthy kids.
We bring together community, researchers, practitioners, policy makers and funders to share our mission to improve the health, development and lives of children and young people through excellence in research. Importantly, we want knowledge applied so it makes a difference.
To achieve this, many types of research methods are applied, including the use of tissue cultures, computer modelling or other laboratory-based methods that do not involve animals. Only when these methods are unsuitable, and where it is absolutely necessary, will researchers use animals in their studies.
The Kids takes extremely seriously its responsibility for the ethical use of animals in research and we are committed to undertaking high-quality animal research that is well designed, uses rigorous and expert peer review, is well reported and ethically justified. Data are shared to ensure the use of animals in specific research areas is not repeated unnecessarily. All studies are conducted according to the Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.
As a signatory to the Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching’s (ANZCCART) Animals in Research Openness Agreement, The Kids is committed to the 3Rs of reduction, replacement and refinement as the basic principles of humane animal research. We are committed to openness and transparency around the use of animals in our research.
High standards of animal welfare, including state-of-the-art housing conditions, rigorous and regular welfare monitoring, and an on-site veterinarian and well-trained staff are central to our commitment to promote ethical, humane and responsible care of animals used for scientific purposes. These standards ensure that we minimise discomfort for animals and enable researchers to secure reliable results.
The Kids recognises that not everybody is comfortable with the use of animals in research and we will continually review our practices with the wider scientific community to reduce the use of animals in research wherever possible and encourage the development of animal alternatives.
Why are animals used for research at The Kids Research Institute Australia?
The Kids Research Institute Australia is committed to ensuring the ethical, humane and responsible care and use of animals in research. Animals are used in research only when it is absolutely necessary and when other methods of study are unsuitable.
The use of animals in research helps us advance scientific understanding and developing solutions to medical problems to protect the safety of people, animals and the environment.
Animal-based research has played a crucial role in basic and applied research, and in the development and testing of new therapies. At The Kids Research Institute Australia, animals are used to advance research into a range of serious issues including childhood cancers, lung disease and infectious diseases.
Which animals are used by The Kids in research?
At The Kids Research Institute Australia animals used in research are restricted to mice and rats.
The Institute is involved in collaborative studies with other organisations, whereby the use of animals such as sheep can also be used in research.
What checks are in place to ensure proper research standards with animals are place?
Strict legislation and ethical protocols guide animal research in Australia. The use of animals in research is governed under the Animal Welfare Act 2002, the Animal Welfare (Scientific Purposes) Regulations 2003, and the Australian Code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes (8 th Edition 2013).
The Kids Research Institute Australia must keep its licence to use animals for scientific purposes. The licence is issued and managed by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. These regulations state that all animal research activities must have Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) approval.
Applications to use animals in scientific research are assessed by the The Kids Animal Ethics Committee (AEC). The AEC is a body of independent advisors that includes a veterinarian, a person committed to animal welfare, a community (lay) person never involved in use of animals for research, and an animal researcher.
These applications are highly scrutinised by the committee for their scientific and ethical justification, and researchers must:
- provide rigorous justification for the need to conduct animal research demonstrate that there is no possibility of using alternatives for their study
- they also must use the lowest number of animals required to achieve valid data
- harm to animals is the minimum possible while positive welfare is maximised
Will the institute stop using animals in research?
Animal experiments are just one method in biological and medical research used by the Institute. We also do research by using cells, tissues, people, and high-tech equipment. These are complementary methods that are used alongside animal research to answer different sorts of questions.
It is currently a challenge to develop non-animal methods to completely replace the use of animals in research. Where non-animal methods have been developed and validated, and are accepted by the regulatory authorities worldwide, then the Institute will use these in preference to the animal tests.
What is the ANZCCART Animals in Research Openness Agreement?
The Australian Openness Agreement is a voluntary pledge that can be signed by organisations wishing to demonstrate their commitment to greater transparency in the use of animals for research or teaching.
This agreement was developed by the Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ANZCCART), and its purpose is to assist Australian organisations that conduct, fund or are otherwise associated with the use of animals in research or teaching to promote openness and support well-informed public discussion. It also seeks to ensure that signatories are open about the use of these animals.
The Institute supports the four commitments of the Openness Agreement:
- Be open about our involvement in the use of animals in research.
- Enhance communications with the media and the public about the use of animals in research.
- Be proactive in providing opportunities for the public to find out about research using animals.
- Report annually on our efforts to improve openness in our use of animals in research.
What is the cost to the animals?
The Animal Ethics Committee is required by law to ensure that the pain and distress of animals is the minimum possible and that the benefits derived from the use of animals are not outweighed by the likely harm to the animals.
How are the animals cared for?
Essential needs (food, water, and housing), stable temperature and humidity range, appropriate social groups, and appropriate enrichment are provided for animals. This allows them to express more natural behaviours and decreases the potential for detrimental mental or physical health effects that may result from the laboratory environment.
This may include providing shelters and nesting materials, group housing, toys, treat foods, chew sticks, human interaction for social species, and opportunities for foraging.
Specialised animal care technicians look after the animals daily, while dedicated veterinarians oversee the animals' physical and psychological health. The scientists who work with these animals are also closely engaged in their care. Researchers depend on robust and healthy animals to produce reliable results, so it is in everyone’s best interest to provide the best care and environment possible. Everyone who works with laboratory animals has a responsibility to care for their well-being.
Australian law dictates that the physical, health, and behavioural needs of animals must be in accord with good practice and scientific knowledge.
Independent External Review
An independent external review of The Kids Research Institute Australia Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) was conducted for the period September 2021 – May 2025 by Dr Geoff Dandie and Dr Jenny Kingham. A summary of their review can be found below.
Having conducted a desktop review of a substantial portion of the relevant paperwork generated by applicants, the AEC and their Officers during the period under review and an in – person review of the AEC operations, Institute staff and relevant facilities, we conclude that the AEC is operating effectively under the Code and the Institute’s practices are compliant.
The AEC at The Kids is somewhat unique in that it is comprised exclusively of external members in all Categories defined under the Code, with the only Institute representatives being the AEO, the AWO and a representative from the Bioresources facility. It is expertly chaired, and all members participate very well during meetings, clearly having done the required reading and preparation for each meeting. The pre-submission review process assists in refining applications before they reach the AEC. This all helps ensure that it also operates extremely efficiently.
The AEC has developed a policy of asking applicants to be available during each meeting and they seem to regularly invite applicants into the room to address specific issues where there is a lack of clarity in the application, missing details or any questions that come up during discussions that cannot be resolved among those in attendance. This also appears to be a very efficient and effective strategy, that helps to ensure decisions can be made quickly and where appropriate, expedites research projects within the Institute.
Facilities within the Institute that are devoted to animal-based studies are very good and maintained at a standard that helps to ensure excellence in all studies. The staff working in support of research and the AEC are exceptional. They are dedicated, conscientious and all seem to be very willing to put in extra time and effort to ensure the wellbeing of animals being used, while also being very supportive of researchers and the work they do.
While this report contains several recommendations, these do not reflect any fundamental problems or concerns and are designed to try and improve what is already a very good system. They should therefore be largely regarded as fine tuning. In this regard, possibly the most important recommendation might be that which suggests freeing up more time for the Manager of Animal Research Governance and Welfare (MARG) to further develop and execute measures she already has in mind. While we acknowledge the excellent job she is doing as the AWO and hope she can continue in that role, we suggest reducing her time there and increasing the fractional appointment of the current relief AWO commensurately to compensate. We believe this should maintain the current excellent standards of animal care that are evident; while facilitating the development of additional training options, optimization of newly acquired software systems and other important duties associated with the MARG role.